Time a question to the peer :Here in the TAB.HH -SH following principles are described in DIN - VDE since 2006 alleging:
"Every accessible in layman area resources such as sockets are equipped with a residual current protective device (RCD ) with a Auslösecarakteristik of 30> ma additionally secure "
Now, however, my work testing jobs in the company have different opinions when it comes to the installation of electrical outlets , what refrigerators and freezers should be plugged example . in fitted kitchens. Some think it must be so with the RCD , others believe the socket is assigned to this since reached the 16A fuse.
It should be noted that we have the main switch and also for a permanently connected device such as the electric stove no upstream RCD is required.
I myself take the view : Assigned sockets do not need RCD .
And how do you think ?
For the price of an RCD , also known as 2-pole version, I no longer ask myself the question ....
Reliability ? The false triggering of an FI are M.E. too low as the one still could aim .
Also, I can never ensure that the refrigerator or which device is ever really there where you have planned it or it depends only this at the outlet
The above opinion I agree fully .
If the chest has an insulation fault , why should not trip an RCD ?
I am often in residential construction .
Each socket is protected by an FI . Only at the customer's extra supply lines to freezing / refrigeration equipment set .
If the Add an RCD in the UV nor will bear , also runs the stove over it.
For the price of a 40A RCD it high voltage testing be in apartments or houses no longer give the circuit is not protected by a RCD .
If an RCD is triggering already so have its correctness .
Safety first potential "collateral damage " of the Gefriegutes .
Yes, that is also so in the rules string .
You just have the socket label so that the user knows that he should not connect a different device there.
